Subscribe to PostsSocial Architects and Online Games
Investigate any 2, shortlisted online communities and become a member.
Use a table to describe the objectives, rules of engagement and unique features
of each and report your findings AFTER becoming a member.
Try to find out who is behind the organisation and management of each online community.
Are they true social architects?
Online Communities
| Online Communities | http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbbc |
|---|---|
| http://www.shufflebrain.com | |
| Objective/s | ...to enable children and their carers to interact with us and with each other in a safe and trusted environment. ....to empower them whilst strengthening our brands. ....provide the best BBC content, a showcase for user-generated material, and the right tools across all the core platforms and devices they use. .....make sure users have easy access to everything we do, whenever they want it, putting CBeebies and CBBC at the forefront of an on-demand future. .....set the expectations of the audience, and most importantly fulfil them. |
| Creating games for social networking “....specializes in creating games and services that enrich your mind, engage your creativity, and connect you up socially. We believe that games are everywhere; games are powerful; games can be a force for good.” “.... creating interactive experiences that are compelling, intuitive and entertaining.” “We want you to have MORE FUN keeping up with your friends. Why just LOOK at photos, videos and status updates when you can PLAY brain-building puzzle games made from that content?” stimulation of the brain while sharing photos | |
| Game/s and Activities | BAMZOOKi, Level Up, Message boards, My cBeebies. Mobile, Trailer maker, Get creative, Me and my movie, More..... |
| Photograb, WordStream – in development | |
| Rules of Engagement | CBBC is geared toward the 7-12yr old age group. Children can only use the site after registering, which basically requires a username, password and valid email address. The site has simple rules and children are encouraged to read them with their parents/guardians before moving into it. There are general copyright rules etc – to ensure that the site is not copied and that any artefacts contributed by students are their own. All this is written in language that the age group would understand – if guided by an adult. Online chatting is moderated – posts are checked before being put onto the site, so it is not real-time chat but this is an important issue with in this age group. Children are asked to “...make sure you ask your parent or guardian for permission before chatting with other children on our message boards and interactive areas.” There are broad guidelines for using the chat and interactives “Remember - never be rude in your messages or give out your full name, home address, school, email address or mobile/home phone number when you're chatting. If you are worried about something you have read on our site, please let us know.” |
| Players are required to be a Facebook member and have a Facebook account to play/use this game. Rules of engagement are basically the rules of the game itself Players are given a circle of details to find in the main picture and 24 seconds to find the spot where those details are in the picture. The score varies – from 20 (perfect) and the lowest score I got was 3 (for being near to the right spot in a difficult game). Most scores are 20, 15(close to the mark), 10 (near to the mark). The player gains various rewards along the way – trivia snippets and awards for attaining levels. Once the game is over, players are rated against friends (from their Facebook list) and others who have played the game previously. Games are rated in difficulty green (easiest) through to red (hardest). | |
| Unique Features | CBBC is affiliated with the British television channel of the same name and gathers a huge range of interactive games and activities to cater for kids aged between 7-12yrs of age. Chats are moderated; with all comments and posts handled by the moderators to ensure they are ok before being posted to the site. My CBBC is a feature to the new CBBC website. It allows the user to create their own "den" or room which the can furnish. It is also possible to create your own avatar. This new feature is heavily promoted on the CBBC Channel |
| Games are integrated and linked into Facebook. Games are user created – anyone can create the game. The user can play the game, leave comments, invite others to join Some competition is present – as high scores of other users/friends are displayed on the screen. | |
| Founders | BBC – UK Lois Walsh Simon Fuller Pete Waterman |
| Amy Jo Kim Scott Kim | |
| Social Architects? | Are the creators true ‘social architects’? It is difficult to “track down” the actual creators of CBBC – Children’s BBC. My guess is that there are many people involved in site design and implementation under the banner of the BBC – British Broadcasting Commission and the actual creators of the site are well hidden. It is a designed social space, however, which appears to meet its objectives and actually helps others to meet theirs too. It enables interaction through games, moderated chat, search, voting, news contributions, reviews, constant news updates and probably many other things I missed as it is a huge site. The site also contains resources for parents and teachers based around informing them and helping to keep their kids “safe” on the net as well as dealing with issues they may be confronted with in day to day life – such as bullying, family structure etc. In this way it does allow people to act on what matters to them. |
| Where CBBC have all the community interaction happening on the pages of one site – with links to other sites that may be of interest, the Shufflebrain site – is only part of the online community. There is information and blogs regarding social networking attached to the Shufflebrain site but its game – Photograb - actually works as link to a much bigger community site – Facebook. Being able to play Photograb only through Facebook, means if one player chooses to play it, the game can automatically interact with any friends that person has within their Facebook community and touches a much wider range of people than having it “googled” or stumbled across on one site. The option to post notes about scores achieved etc. to the pages of Facebook friends would automatically stir up some competitiveness and challenge friends to outdo each other. It also gives people the opportunity to interact with others outside their immediate group of friends and widen their personal connections within the community. The game is marketed well too – not just “a game” but a game to “enrich and stimulate the mind”. Many people would be “hooked” by this line and be able to justify their use of it by this endorsement. Using Photograb does allow people to act on what matters to them – building self-confidence, sense of achievement, healthy/fun competition, reputation, not to mention mind stimulation and of course, broadening their online community in a time when it is deemed important to do so. |
Leave a reply
jamie
November 19th, 2014 at 08:58
visitor@espouses.intending” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ!…
Perry
November 19th, 2014 at 21:25
rationalization@racie.domitians” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thank you!!…
Dan
November 21st, 2014 at 20:24
advisable@unilaterally.zeus” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðåí!…
Mike
November 22nd, 2014 at 07:13
parkish@putout.veblen” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïàñèáî!!…
Evan
November 23rd, 2014 at 10:51
amadees@moloch.ram” rel=”nofollow”>.…
hello….
Jimmie
November 23rd, 2014 at 14:18
floats@paraphrases.overrode” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñýíêñ çà èíôó….
Gerald
November 24th, 2014 at 03:39
rung@disqualified.queen” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thank you….
Sergio
November 25th, 2014 at 10:27
unfavorable@poorest.sewn” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ!!…
clyde
November 25th, 2014 at 20:17
callous@portuguese.heart” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx!…
Albert
November 26th, 2014 at 06:00
calculate@service.seaboard” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thanks for information!…
Clifford
November 28th, 2014 at 22:44
beribboned@reward.decorated” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good info!!…
barry
November 29th, 2014 at 05:10
idealistic@peep.cynicism” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx for info!!…
chad
November 29th, 2014 at 19:12
perfusion@bluish.pipeline” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðþ!!…
Alexander
December 1st, 2014 at 04:14
dakota@misrepresentation.protested” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…
doug
December 1st, 2014 at 14:37
moultons@crazily.accidents” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ çà èíôó!!…
eddie
December 6th, 2014 at 10:44
countin@bothered.heretic” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx for info!!…
Brandon
December 7th, 2014 at 06:28
replenish@timeworn.contradicted” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñýíêñ çà èíôó….
Gregory
December 9th, 2014 at 04:33
divisions@buggers.keel” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx for info….
Everett
December 10th, 2014 at 14:54
collectively@lews.potsdam” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…
Greg
December 10th, 2014 at 15:36
phonic@grillwork.occasion” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thanks for information!…
Ronald
December 10th, 2014 at 16:15
duhagon@harburgs.mcneill” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good info….
Edward
December 12th, 2014 at 00:34
gentlemanly@scalded.clocked” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thanks!!…
Gabriel
December 12th, 2014 at 07:29
chattels@transatlantic.acid” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðþ….
Joseph
December 14th, 2014 at 08:51
megalopolises@cheek.ruptured” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thanks!…
evan
December 14th, 2014 at 09:29
professorship@dormitory.garine” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…
ronnie
December 16th, 2014 at 15:13
inhibiting@tumors.maybe” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðþ!…
Jacob
December 16th, 2014 at 21:24
platforms@upperandupper.recommendation” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ….
luke
December 19th, 2014 at 11:57
glycerinated@hackettstown.marries” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ!…
Eddie
December 19th, 2014 at 15:52
complement@fairing.surrendering” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thanks!…
Joe
December 20th, 2014 at 10:55
antagonism@stipulates.exertions” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…
Bryan
December 21st, 2014 at 08:00
hall@stolidly.jai” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…
Doug
December 23rd, 2014 at 08:16
abstracting@ulcerations.steamship” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good….
Tony
December 25th, 2014 at 15:18
urged@bric.pong” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good!!…
trevor
December 26th, 2014 at 02:46
alabamans@novels.evaluating” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx for info!…
Dustin
January 17th, 2015 at 09:51
unacquainted@obediences.histochemical” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðþ!!…
Wayne
January 18th, 2015 at 21:27
maximize@swallow.oiled” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…
Rafael
January 19th, 2015 at 20:54
holiness@eqn.transom” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good info!…
adrian
January 20th, 2015 at 04:20
bud@dumping.inadequacy” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good….
Gerard
January 25th, 2015 at 15:33
asunder@triplication.merges” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ….
Scott
January 25th, 2015 at 16:06
quartermaster@poises.forehead” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx for info….
randall
January 26th, 2015 at 08:16
declare@morgenthaus.waterflows” rel=”nofollow”>.…
thanks!…
dave
January 26th, 2015 at 08:49
francaise@thurbers.weight” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…
Juan
January 30th, 2015 at 09:17
goodby@blanket.fresnel” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïàñèáî!…
alex
January 30th, 2015 at 09:52
whitehall@intriguingly.spreading” rel=”nofollow”>.…
áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….
Hector
January 31st, 2015 at 13:38
purveyor@cairns.flannel” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….
Gregory
January 31st, 2015 at 16:48
sampled@celestial.dispassionately” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….
theodore
January 31st, 2015 at 17:20
betrayer@campo.mceachern” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ!…
edwin
January 31st, 2015 at 17:50
aspirin@pink.benighted” rel=”nofollow”>.…
hello!!…
Edward
January 31st, 2015 at 18:19
reasonable@commissions.thermometer” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñýíêñ çà èíôó….
Marshall
February 9th, 2015 at 00:13
segregated@dandys.hairpin” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good….