• Topic 6 - Exercise 3

    Trust and Reputation - How is it achieved?

    Analyse and comment on other aspects of online trust and reputation  that you feel are worth discussing across any TWO online communities. Consider how design for usability, sociability and sustainablity can help to foster trust and build a reputation among users especially the pragmatists, conservatives and skeptics.

    When we say we trust someone or that someone is trustworthy, we implicitly mean that the probability that he will perform an action that is beneficial or at least not detrimental to us is high enough for us to consider engaging in some form of cooperation with him.

    Diego Gambetta

    http://wiki.uni.lu/secan-lab/Trust+($28)Diego+Gambetta($29).html

     

    Beginning as a closed network for American students, Facebook was perceived as safe by users who networked solely with friends. Opening Facebook up to the rest of the world brought issues that challenged user trust.

    Seemingly from other users -

    • phishing scams - WALL postings linking to urls mimicking Facebook accounts
    • friend spam - people asking to be friends but really wanting you to sign up for other services

     Others from within the facility -

    • text alerts sent to the wrong people
    • linked advertisement systems - broadcasting user purchases made from affiliated sites on their WALL.
    • Treatment of personal data such as   
      • inexplicable loss or disappearance
      • inability to delete personal data from deactivated accounts

    Discovering these glitches, I questioned participation and wondered why Facebook is still well trusted, was recently announced within Truste’s top 10 sites - www.truste.com and  a world user-base topping 300million in Sept.2009. 
    Both usability and sociability are high on the reasons why. 
    Facebook is easy to join and use, offering  ‘connection’ to others across the world.  It caters for  fast moving lives, where computer use is ever present,  allowing frequent message posting and reciprocation to WALLS - rather than making contact less frequently by other methods.
    Facebook has encountered problems, yet the privacy section covers them, stating age limits and user rights and responsibilities - how many people actually read the fine print? 
    There is also a page at
    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=555062239&ref=name#/facebook?ref=pf   dealing with  current software or user problems and there is no fear of media releases  such as
    http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90781/90877/6742651.html  reporting on Canadian legislation set to change how all personal data will be dealt with on the site.
    Acceptance by sites like Truste build Facebook’s reputation and credibility in user eyes, showing that they are working on problems adds to perception of expertise and honesty - “we aren’t perfect but we are doing something about it”.  Users also perceive that the majority of experiences are positive and decide to ‘follow’ - taking risks with the site, which they might not have taken otherwise and add constantly to the overall level of trust in the site. Read the rest of this entry »


  • Topic 6 - Exercise 2c

    Wiki and Moodle design

    Using your CSU Interact wiki or other wiki experience and your
    short experience as a Moodle member, answer the following:

    c. Is the presence of likeable features also a combination of the design tips for
    usability, sociability and sustainability, as advocated by Preece and Kim in earlier topics?

    c. The presence of likeable features in Moodle and Wiki software are inextricably combined with the design tips for usability, sociability and sustainability  outlined by Preece and Kim.
    If a user is faced with complications or problems accessing a social network, if the navigation is cumbersome or information hidden under layers they will more than likely not use it or certainly be deterred from doing so.  It is not unusual to hear from users that they don’t “like” a particular piece of software or a social networking site because their experiences have been difficult either with installation or attempts at use. Personally, I am a user who needs to see a purpose in something before I begin to use it or investigate it further.  For example, I am new to Facebook and Second Life (amongst a lot of other social networking sites) since beginning this course. I am able to see a purpose for using Facebook to connect with others in my selective personal, community. I can see a purpose for it professionally - as an easily accessed and navigated discussion site or repository for ideas. Read the rest of this entry »


  • Topic 6 - Exercise 2b

    Wiki and Moodle design

    Using your CSU Interact wiki or other wiki experience and
    your short experience as a Moodle member, answer the following:

    b. What features do wiki and Moodle have in common and what are the differences (eg a Wiki, Forum and blogtool is also groupware design feature inside a Moodle site) ?

    b. Both Moodles and Wikis are examples of Web 2.0 technology used for learning. Moodle is a CMS - Course Management System - and is designed to encompass many tools and features catering for differing learning needs and styles of users along with flexibility in course delivery and structure. For education, Moodles are probably geared toward secondary and post secondary learners as they offer real-time communication such as chat - a difficult tool to monitor in younger students. Moodle is an open-source project, so the source code can be changed by any programmer to create new features, resulting in many ways to customize its desktop and resulting in constant evolution.
    Wiki is a tool designed to provide opportunity for students to collaboratively learn in an asynchronous environment. A document (i.e., Article) in a wiki can be created or edited at anytime by anyone, they are editable through a web browser, and a user needs no other web application, database skills, or authoring expertise. This makes it suitable for a wider range of learning ages. The editing tool in a Wiki is a familiar WYSIWYG - What You See Is What You Get - editing system, turning a webpage easily into an editable document. Often used as “standalone” software, Wikis are also offered as a tool within the Moodle CMS.  Read the rest of this entry »


  • Topic 6 - Exercise 2a

    Wiki and Moodle design

    Using your CSU Interact wiki or other wiki experience and your short
    experience as a Moodle member, answer the following:

    a. What is it about the design of the wiki and Moodle that you liked or disliked?

    a. I have often seen my daughter access homework documents or class notes from the school Moodle site, however, I haven’t had any previous experience using Moodle myself.
    Logging in was new to me.  I spent about an hour touring the site after creating an account, verifying  my email address and signing in to the Moodle for 510/213. The account was easy to set up and along with the password from Ken I got into the site without a problem
    .

    I liked what I saw and was impressed with the uncluttered layout of the Moodle interface - to me, that reflects the professional purpose of the site. I have to admit, I like some colour and personality, but I can make up for that on other sites that I visit. The interface reminded me of Blog sites I use or have used - central area and different tools around it with highlighted links to connect to other pages/areas of Moodle. Read the rest of this entry »


  • Topic 6 - Exercise 1

    Design rules and your CSU Forum experience

     EMT 501 - was my first contact with a subject that was relatively unstructured.  We had basic guidelines, but could focus on any area we liked and present our work in any format we liked as an e-portfolio. We were given particular tasks to complete for inclusion in the portfolio but were encouraged to look in depth at a particular area where we felt a need to develop skills.

    As students undertaking the course we had to make the effort to join the CSU forum initially - that was our responsibility. It didn’t just magically appear - we had to go looking for it and add it to our forum group. I know this gave me a sense of joining a group of like-minded people and helped me focus on the subject and processes I needed to undertake  it successfully.

    My experience with the online forum for this subject was that we were a large, varied group driven by a common goal -  understanding of the task/s at hand and subject completion. This helped us support each other particularly during the times leading up to assessment submission and completion. We often pooled ideas or called on a member’s skills in particular areas of ICT to help with tasks. Read the rest of this entry »